| 
  | 
  | 
 
 
 The foot is so much better - went out for an evening 
stroll last night, hardly limping at all. On El Camino, 
a running man passed me - he was futuristic, yet quite 
contemporary. His build said "Native American" to me, 
an impression augmented by his swinging ponytail. In the 
small of his back a ruby warning light pulsed - slowly, 
like his heartbeat (unlike the rapid strobing of my own 
red light I wear during night bike rides). It was 
visible for some distance, as he jogged away to the 
north. I think I'll be ready for the treadmill by Sunday.
 
 
 Merged my code this morning, just under the wire, proving 
once again that old adage about software development, how 
the time it takes expands to fill the schedule allotted to 
it. Afterwards, checking it out, the Big Fear when my usual 
test file didn't work. Tried with the small files I'd 
made, which contained individual flights, they were okay. 
Then I connected up with our live data feed from DFW, actually 
the first valid test, and things seemed okay again, so I 
concluded that some new addition elsewhere in the applications 
isn't agreeing with my test file format. (Worked fine up until 
yesterday, though.) Our system focuses on arriving aircraft; 
but I fixed one of the few features involving departures: I've 
been changing flights' times, usually delaying them - but not 
really, only the actual controllers' workstations have the 
connections necessary to do that.  
 
 
 Became acquainted with another voice of reason 
at lunch, in an interview in the radio - Richard 
Grossman ("The Program on Corporations, 
Law & Democracy") - he says we went wrong with that 
big decision made in 1886 about how corporations 
had individual rights, even before women or people of 
color were given the right to vote. 
This is a good introductory 
essay.
 
 
 From an article in the end-of-year "New Yorker," 
the "fiction" issue, where George W. S. Trow deconstructs 
"The New York Times," now and in comparison with the 
February 1, 1950 issue: 
 
While I was learning to read the papers, television - an 
ignorant little snippet of a medium - was in the wings. 
It had no real standing in February, 1950, but of all 
our cultural avatars I encountered in New York as a boy 
it was what was going to be left standing. Looking back 
at the Times of 1950, I wonder if our current 
culture of irony and anger and freneticism - our TV 
culture - doesn't have its essential qualities because 
the culture as a whole in America in 1950 felt in its 
bones a contradiction. Having just climbed the pinnacle, 
stretching our cultural fabric to the limit along the 
way, we were condemned by the nature of the 
moment - technology interacting with our fundamental 
war-weariness and our need for distraction - to 
embrace a foolish child's reaction to a world 
situation that demanded a mind more remarkably 
adult than any of us had in fact achieved.
My view of the civilization as it was presented in 
the Times of February, 1950, is that in the 
Second World War the Germans lost and television won.
  
Personally, I've never taken to the "New York Times." 
I rarely select it if there's a choice. Although I 
disagree with a lot of its agenda, and find it tragically 
undignified the way the use puns in headlines now, 
I still retain some loyalty to my first employer, 
"The Washington Post"  (and look 
forward to the day when "Herblock" retires). 
 | 
  |